Perspective from the field
We don't need security libraries. We need libraries and frameworks that abstract security issues and make software safe by default. We will continue to fail for as long as we expect developers to be security experts.
Personally, I would prefer to keep it as modular as possible, so I have to agree with Michael on that one. We need "Standardized Security Libraries" which we can integrate in either frameworks or, directly in our code. To tie security related code to a specific framework, would actually complicate the what need to be K.I.S.S.
I don't think we'll be able to completely remove the responsibility of security from the developers. I agree that, when possible, lets abstract away security and make it safe by default. However, there are still a lot of security issues which must be addressed by the developer.Instead of making the developer create a security solution from scratch, which would require them to be security experts as Ivan pointed out, provide developers with security libraries which have been designed by the security experts. If the developers are aware of the fundamental security concerns, and have security libraries available which are easy to use, then we have a good chance of developing much more secure code.
Comments are welcomed. Spam and obvious advertisements that are unrelated to the post will be deleted.